How it works Pricing FAQ Join the beta
Supabrain  ›  Compare  ›  vs Zep
Honest comparison

Supabrain vs Zep

Both give an AI agent long-term memory — but for different jobs. Zep is enterprise infrastructure you build into your own product so your users get a temporal knowledge graph. Supabrain is memory for the agent you personally code with — installed and connected over MCP in minutes.

Join the beta Jump to the table
TL;DR — Zep is a powerful temporal-knowledge-graph memory platform — cloud-first (managed, BYOK, or self-host-in-your-VPC), built to power memory for your end-users. Fully self-hosting it means running raw Graphiti + a graph DB (Neo4j/FalkorDB) + your own embedding/LLM pipeline. Supabrain is the plug-and-play version for a different job: memory for your own coding agent — install, connect MCP, done — local, private, one central brain across every AI tool you use.
The distinction that matters

Infrastructure for your users — or memory for you

This isn't apples to apples, and that's the point. Zep is a graph-memory platform you build into a product, tracking your users' sessions, business data, and access controls. Supabrain is the appliance you plug into your own coding agent — installed, connected, central across your tools, in minutes.

Zep

A platform · you build on it

Enterprise agent-memory infrastructure that stores and retrieves context as a temporal knowledge graph — facts carry validity windows, and outdated facts are invalidated, not deleted. Delivered as an SDK/API ("integrates in three lines"), on the widely-adopted Graphiti open-source engine.

Cloud-first. Easy to start in the cloud; fully self-hosting now means standing up raw Graphiti + a graph DB + your own LLM pipeline — at least three systems to provision, monitor, and maintain.

Supabrain

An appliance · plug and play

Install the app, connect it to Claude Code, Cursor, or any MCP client, and your AI work memory is live in minutes — no databases to run, no graph-DB expertise, no keys to juggle.

One central memory for all your AI work, local and private by default. Your decisions, fixes, and ruled-out dead ends — recalled in every tool you use.

Head to head

Where they actually differ

Compared on what it actually takes to give your own coding agent a memory.

CapabilitySupabrainZep
Setup for your agentMinutesdownload app, connect MCP, doneCloud: API key + SDKeasy in cloud; full self-host is heavy
Infra you operateNoneA graph-DB stack (self-host)raw Graphiti + Neo4j/FalkorDB + your own embedding/LLM pipeline
Local & privateBy defaultstorage, embeddings & search on your machineCloud-firstmanaged; BYOK / BYOC self-host-in-VPC
Who it's forYour own agentmemory for the dev's coding agentYour end-usersinfra you embed in a product you ship
PricingFlatsolo free · team ~$25 pp/mo · no meterUsage / credit-basedfree tier · ~$149 → $1,499/mo (third-party-reported)
Memory modelValidated conclusionschecked on the way in, incl. dead endsTemporal knowledge graphbitemporal facts, invalidated not deleted
MCPDrop-in memoryany MCP client; switch tools, memory followsAccount-ops serverexists for Claude/Cursor, but drives the Zep service
RetrievalHybridkeyword (FTS) + semanticGraph + semantic
Agent ledgerBuilt inun-skippable, tamper-evident action recordAudit / provenanceenterprise, around the graph
Best fitYour own AI work memoryEvolving-fact memory for your users
Why developers pick Supabrain

What you get for not running a graph-DB stack

Live in minutes, not a procurement cycle

No Graphiti, no Neo4j or FalkorDB, no embedding/LLM pipeline to provision and monitor. The whole setup is a download and one MCP connection — then your agent remembers.

One central brain for all your AI work

Every MCP tool shares the same memory. Move from Cursor to Claude Code, swap models, change machines — it follows you. (Cursor pulled its own Memories feature in late 2025; portable beats per-vendor.)

It never leaves your machine

Storage, embeddings, and search are local by default — not cloud-first. No cloud round-trip, no managed store; your codebase decisions stay yours.

Your bill doesn’t grow with your memory

Credit- and usage-based pricing taxes the one thing you most want to do — remember everything. Local cost is ~zero, so Supabrain is flat and unlimited. No usage anxiety.

Conclusions, not a user fact graph

Supabrain stores validated work findings — what was true, what was a dead end — tuned for your coding agent, not a bitemporal graph of your users' business facts.

MCP that’s actually memory

Supabrain’s MCP is a drop-in memory for your agent. Zep’s MCP server exists, but it’s oriented around driving the Zep service and managing your account — not being your agent’s memory.

When Zep is the right call

Counter-positioning cuts both ways. Zep is excellent — best-in-class, even — at a job Supabrain doesn’t do:

Those are builder and platform problems, and Zep is built for them. Supabrain is for the developer who just wants their own work memory — plugged in and central, not a system to operate.

Pricing, plainly

Flat & local beats credit-based & cloud

Supabrain
$0 → ~$25
Solo free · Team ~$25 per person / month, flat. Unlimited memories & queries, no meter, no infra to run. Enterprise self-host / BYOC.
Zep (managed)
$0 → $1,499
Free tier, then paid tiers roughly $149, $499, and $1,499 per month — usage- and credit-based. Or self-host (raw Graphiti + a graph DB + your own LLM pipeline) to run it yourself.

Zep pricing and features as publicly listed, June 2026 (third-party-reported) — approximate; verify current terms on the vendor’s site. Supabrain team figures are launch pricing for early access.

FAQ

Quick answers

Is Supabrain a Zep alternative?+

It depends on the job. Zep is memory infrastructure you build into your own product so your end-users get a temporal knowledge graph of their facts. If instead you just want your own coding agent to remember your work, Supabrain is the far simpler fit — install, connect over MCP in minutes, local and private. Zep is still the better pick when you’re shipping evolving-fact memory to your users with enterprise compliance.

Is my data more private with Supabrain?+

Supabrain is local-first — storage, embeddings, and search run on your machine, and nothing leaves unless you turn on sync. Zep is cloud-first: managed Zep Cloud, with BYOK and a BYOC self-host-in-your-VPC option. Fully self-hosting it now means running raw Graphiti plus a graph DB (Neo4j or FalkorDB) plus your own embedding and LLM pipeline.

Does Supabrain store a knowledge graph like Zep?+

No, and on purpose. Zep models facts as a bitemporal knowledge graph — excellent for tracking what was true and when it changed. Supabrain stores validated work conclusions for your coding agent — structured findings checked on the way in, including ruled-out dead ends — so your agent recalls what worked and what was a trap.

Can I use it with Cursor and Claude Code?+

Yes. Supabrain is MCP-native, so it works in any MCP client — Claude Code, Cursor, and others — on any machine. Zep also has an MCP server, but it exposes account operations to drive the Zep service rather than acting as a drop-in memory for your agent.

Early access

Plug in a memory that’s yours

Install it, connect MCP, and your AI work memory is live in minutes — local, private, and central across every tool you use. Join the beta for an invite.